Cramly appears as a modest contender in the field of AI detection tools, with a service Ahelp score of 59.67. It offers basic features for identifying between human-written and AI-generated text, with an accuracy of 31.67. This AI content detector accepts simple text inputs and is reliable in educational settings, but it has significant limits in technology identification and lacks a variety of integration options.Despite these efforts, Cramly’s overall performance implies there is space for development, notably in terms of detecting capabilities and user interface.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Detecting-AI’s  Accuracy —31.67/50

Cramly’s performance in AI text detection is variable. When examining text written entirely by AI, Cramly correctly identified it with 100% accuracy, demonstrating its potential for detecting unambiguous examples of AI authorship. However, its powers are significantly limited when analyzing human-written content, with a 70% risk of AI participation being incorrectly attributed. This disparity is further underscored in its treatment of paraphrased language, where it overestimates the presence of AI, implying a tendency for false positives in more complex settings. Additionally, the service employs a rather cumbersome method for presenting results. Rather than evaluating the entire text as a whole, it indicates the level of AI involvement sentence by sentence, requiring users to manually calculate the total percentage. We find this as a very odd solution. Such findings highlight a crucial area for improvement in discriminating with higher precision across a wider range of texts.

AI Detection Results: 19/30

Detecting-AI’s Value for Money —13/25

It’s very hard to evaluate what basically is a one-page service. With a value-for-money score of 13, Cramly positions itself as an accessible option for those needing basic AI detection capabilities. All users need to do is to paste their text and hit a check button. Nothing more, like a browser plug-in or file uploading is supported. The AI detecting feature is free, and paid plans are designed for those users who want to benefit from other functions such as plagiarism checker or content writing. While the absence of advanced features and integrations might deter some, the tool’s straightforward design and the inclusion of a free trial period reflect an attempt to provide value to its user base.

Detecting-AI’s Overall Experience — 15/25

Cramly offers a basic yet functional user experience, with easy registration that includes third-party sign-in options. Its simplistic design facilitates quick access to its core features, making it straightforward for users to get started. However, the platform’s aesthetic and utility are hindered by a lack of advanced features like multi-language detection and a more engaging interface. This simplicity, while appealing to some, may not satisfy users seeking comprehensive analysis or deeper insights into text origins.

Conclusion

Cramly serves as an entry-level solution for users and educational institutions requiring basic AI text detection. While it demonstrates competence in identifying overtly AI-generated content, its accuracy falters in more complex or subtle contexts. The tool’s value proposition is bolstered by its affordability and ease of use, though its overall utility is constrained by technological and experiential limitations. Enhancements in detection sophistication and user interface could significantly elevate Cramly’s standing as a go-to AI detection service.

FAQ

Cramly’s  Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4	n/a
ChatGPT	n/a
Bard	n/a
Human
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools	n/a
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial	n/a
Discounts	n/a
Limits	n/a
Loyalty	n/a
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign-in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Cramly Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Sapling is marketed as an advanced and robust AI content detection service, capable of identifying text produced by various AI text generators. It offers a limited free version and a fully functional paid version, along with a mobile application specifically for the Chrome browser. Despite its impressive specifications on paper, practical tests have revealed notable inaccuracies in its scanning results.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Sapling AI Detector’s Accuracy — 25/50

Sapling’s AI detector presents a unique case where it identifies all types of texts as fully AI-generated, including those written entirely by humans. While this demonstrates a high sensitivity to potential AI-written content, it raises concerns about accuracy and false positives. The tool’s inability to discern human-written text (scoring 0 out of 10 in accuracy for human text) could be a significant drawback for users seeking nuanced detection capabilities.

AI Detection Results: 15/30

Sapling AI Detector’s Value for Money —17/25

Sapling offers free and paid plans, with the free version allowing up to 2000 characters. Its PRO plan is priced at $25 per month, and there’s an enterprise option with customized pricing. However, the lack of discounts and loyalty programs, combined with its limited detection capabilities and over-sensitive algorithm, might make users question its value for money. Although we believe the inclusion of MS Word integration and a Chrome browser extension does add some appeal to its pricing plans.

Sapling AI Detector’s Overall Experience — 17/25

There are varied results when evaluating Sapling as a user perspective. Positively, there are several sign-in methods and no registration requirements, so users may start using the site without any hassles. The tool’s simple design and ease of use make navigating through it a breeze. The restricted support options (no phone or instant chat) and the interface’s lack of aesthetic appeal, however, take away from the whole experience. Its inability to recognize languages other than English may further restrict its attractiveness to a worldwide user base.

Conclusion

Sapling may not be the most aesthetically pleasing tool but it can be helpful when it comes to AI detection. Allowing to check up to 2000 characters for free and without registration, this service, alongside its versatile selection of extra features, can come in handy to those needing a quick check of their work before submitting it. So, if you are not satisfied with your Sapling experience, consider exploring a new AI checker for essays to extend the capabilities of your toolkit even further.

FAQ

Sapling AI Detector’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts
Limits	Free plan: 2000 characters per query (400 tokens) ENTERPRISE and Pro plans: 8000 characters (2000 tokens)
Loyalty
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign-in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection	n/a
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Sapling AI Detector Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Detecting-AI is an AI content detector that analyzes various types of written content, such as documents, articles, social media messages, and website content. It is designed to pinpoint AI-generated content created by different AI models like ChatGPT, GPT3, GPT2, and others. The website claims an accuracy rate of 98%, and our experience with the AI detection tool proves that it does its job quite well. 

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Detecting-AI’s  Accuracy —31.67/50

Detecting-AI shows a robust ability to distinguish between AI-generated and human-written texts. In tests, it correctly identified a text as 56.5% AI-generated, though it overestimated the human contribution. So, in general, if somebody would use an AI report writer and didn’t change a thing, it would be potentially flagged by the service. Its performance in detecting paraphrased content was less accurate, with a tendency to perceive such texts as predominantly human-written. Nonetheless, the tool’s overall accuracy in distinguishing between AI and human inputs is commendable, making it a reliable option for those seeking to discern the origin of digital content.

AI Detection Results: 19/30

Detecting-AI’s Value for Money —16/25

Detecting-AI scores well in terms of value for money, offering a free service with no limits on usage. We believe, this is a significant advantage for users who need AI detection without the burden of subscription fees. The lack of a free trial is not a concern given the free nature of the service. However, the absence of detailed pricing plans for additional features or higher limits means users have limited options for scaling up if needed.

Detecting-AI’s Overall Experience — 17/25

Users will find Detecting-AI’s interface aesthetic and user-friendly, with a focus on ease of use. Registration is not mandatory and can also be done using Google sign-in option, which simplifies the process. However, the lack of multi-language detection might limit its accessibility for some users. The website offers a quick process for analysis, but lacks features like a printable report. The overall experience is satisfactory, but there is room for improvement, especially in making the tool more comprehensive and user-friendly.

FAQ

Detecting-AI’s  Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard	n/a
Human	n/a
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education	n/a
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial	n/a
Discounts	n/a
Limits	5000 characters in free use
Loyalty	n/a
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign-in options	Google sign-in
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection	n/a
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Detecting-AI Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Originality.ai is a specialized tool to detect AI-generated text and identify plagiarism within content. Although it is focused specifically on the needs of web publishers, we tested its capabilities for educational purposes and found that it does its job well regardless of the domain.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Originality AI’s Detection Accuracy — 28.33/50

Originality AI demonstrates commendable performance in identifying text generated by various AI models, including the latest versions like GPT-4. It claims a 99% accuracy rate for GPT-4 detection and around 83% for ChatGPT, with a minimal false positive rate of approximately 2%. These figures indicate robust capabilities in distinguishing AI-authored content. However, coming from our experience, the tool struggles to accurately assess purely human-written texts and paraphrased materials, reflecting a need for improvement in handling such content.

AI Detection Results: 17/30

Originality AI’s Value for Money —16/25

Originality AI does not offer a permanently free version but provides a trial through its Chrome extension. The pricing options here vary a bit. There’s a monthly Base subscription that goes for $14.95/month and provides users with 2000 credits. Aside from that, there’s also a one-time payment option of $30 that can buy 3000 credits. However, there’s a loyalty program offering lifetime recurring commissions. We find that while the tool offers average value for money, users seeking more comprehensive support or integration with MS Word might find these missing features impacting the overall value proposition.

Originality AI’s Overall Experience —17/25

The user experience with Originality AI is fairly straightforward. Registration is required, but the process is direct without the need for third-party sign-ins or phone numbers. The website offers an aesthetic and easy-to-use interface with a quick process for scanning texts. There’s also a support chat that allows you to report any issue you have during the detection process. We believe that users can benefit from a free trial via the Chrome extension, although there’s no permanent free version available. The tool’s lack of multi-language detection could be seen as a minor drawback though.

Conclusion

Originality is a famous tool and we can see why. It is convenient, easy to use, and shows very detailed results when it comes to AI detection. However, we agree that this service is not for everyone, considering the absence of a free plan and rather limited subscription options. All things taken into account, it can still be a useful AI checker essay and worth trying at least once.

FAQ

Originality AI’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload	n/a
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial	only through the Chrome extension (50 credits)
Discounts
Limits	3000 credits for $30 2000 credits for $14.95/month
Loyalty	Earn 25% lifetime recurring commissions
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Originality AI Detector Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Turnitin, the go-to plagiarism checker for universities worldwide, has added another trick to its bag — a solid AI content detector. Curious about its capabilities? AcademicHelp took it for a spin to see if it could sniff out AI-generated text in essays and papers. And the results were pretty impressive! Turnitin effectively identifies AI content, proving itself to be a helpful tool for students and educators alike. We’re not talking about catching copy-paste anymore — it stepped up to tackle the AI writing era. If you’ve ever wondered how reliable an AI detector could be, Turnitin’s tool seems ready to keep both academics and AI on their toes.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Turnitin’s Detection Accuracy — 42/50

Turnitin’s AI detection accuracy gets a gold star from us for spotting pure AI-generated content, earning a flawless 10/10 in tests with 100% AI-written text. Impressive, right? It also nails human-written pieces with another 10/10. It knows the difference between a chatbot and a stressed-out student (even if we ourselves can’t always tell). But there’s a catch: when it comes to paraphrased content, Turnitin trips a bit, scoring just 1/10. Basically, if you make an AI cocktail and mix things up a bit with editing and rewording, Turnitin has a tougher time. So, while it’s amazing in clear-cut scenarios, those trickier blended texts might give it some trouble. It’s a solid tool for straightforward use but could use a little fine-tuning to handle more nuanced mixed compositions of AI and human writing.

AI Detection Results: 21/30

Turnitin’s Value for Money — 10/25

For the Turnitin AI detector free is not an option. It isn’t exactly what you’d call a “casual purchase.” In fact, it’s more of a big-picture solution for schools and universities than something for individual users. No AI detector Turnin free trial, no limited version — it’s priced at $3 per student annually for educational institutions. Forget about grabbing a personal license; Turnitin doesn’t offer those. While it works well as part of a larger academic integrity system, it’s missing a few conveniences like a browser extension or MS Word integration, which would make it more versatile. Diminishes its value proposition, you know? Still, for institutions in need of a dependable AI detector, it could be worth the investment, even if it doesn’t cater to solo users.

Turnitin’s Overall Experience — 14/25

Turnitin’s website delivers a smooth, user-oriented experience with a clean interface that can carry even the greenest tech newbies to the correct button. The scanning process is fast and includes multilingual detection — a nice touch. You’ll also get clear, printable reports, which is a handy way to review results. The downside: you have to register, and there’s no third-party sign-in (so no quick Google login here). On the support front, Turnitin falls a little short. There’s no live chat, phone hotline, or social media help, and the FAQ section is pretty minimal. 

If you’re looking for extra accuracy, pairing the Turnitin AI detection free tool with an AI checker essay free tool might just take your essay-checking game to the next level.

FAQ

Turnitin’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration	n/a
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts	n/a
Limits	n/a
Loyalty
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat	n/a
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Turnitin AI Detector Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

The main difference between Turnitin vs GPTzero lies in their specialized functions within the academic environment. GPTZero has become known among students for its ability to scan their writing for AI content for free. On the other hand, Turnitin is a common tool in many educational institutions, primarily used for scanning academic papers to detect plagiarism. While the choice between them depends on individual needs, it's clear both tools, including an AI essay checker, are indispensable throughout one's academic studies.

Quick Overview

Turnitin and GPTzero are well-known in the world of education. Turnitin is mainly used in schools and universities, while GPTzero is popular among a wider audience, including students, content creators, and copywriters. The AcademicHelp team compared these two to see which one is better at detecting plagiarism. So, is GPTzero accurate? Yes, but so is Turnitin – they’re just designed for different settings.

[top-list-service-advatages] [top-list-service-advatages-list title="Liked about GPTzero" icon="good"] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Batch files upload[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]]Free trial[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [/top-list-service-advatages-list] [top-list-service-advatages-list title="Liked about Turnitin" icon="good"] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Accurate AI detection[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Reputable with educational institutions[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [/top-list-service-advatages-list] [/top-list-service-advatages]

[content_fragment id="117106" /]

Our experts conducted a mystery shopping experiment to discover a tool that would meet education requirements and protect authenticity in writing. Today, we are comparing Turnitin vs GPTzero to answer the question “is Turnitin ai detector accurate?” and hopefully find the tool that can deliver superior educational support.

Comparing Value for Money: Turnitin vs GPTzero

Comparing Overall Experience: Turnitin vs GPTzero

Turnitin vs GPTzero: Which Is Better for AI Detection?

Winner

Catch your breath: the winner is Turnitin. While this plagiarism detection service is not for wide use, it serves its purpose of guarding original work and spotting various modifications in writing. 

The post GPTzero vs Turnitin appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Writefull, as a modern AI detector and academic writing assistant, aims to streamline and enhance students’ work. While it has demonstrated proficiency in identifying original author text, there have been disagreeing results concerning AI involvement. Overall, it offers valuable features and functions, but the question remains: how good are AI detectors at addressing these inconsistencies, which may affect its ranking as a top-tier service?

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Writefull’s Detection Accuracy —16.67/50

Writefull’s performance in AI detection is a mixed bag. It excels in identifying human-written text, indicating only a 1% likelihood of AI involvement. This high accuracy is commendable and suggests that the service can be trusted to discern human authorship effectively. However, it falls short in detecting text that is entirely AI-generated or paraphrased, showing the same 1% likelihood of AI authorship. This indicates a significant challenge in recognizing AI-written or modified content, which we believe could limit its usefulness in certain scenarios.

AI Detection Results: 10/30

Writefull’s Value for Money —16/25

Writefull offers reasonable value for money, with a score of 16 out of 25 in this category. Users can access the service for free or choose from various subscription plans, including monthly, quarterly, and yearly options, with the annual plan being the most economical at $1.90/month. While it lacks a free trial and loyalty discounts, it offers competitive pricing, especially for long-term commitments, which we find as a solid competitive advantage.

Writefull’s Overall Experience —15/25

Writefull’s user experience is relatively straightforward. Registration is not required, allowing quick access to the service. The website interface is aesthetically pleasing and easy to use, facilitating a swift detection process. However, the lack of clear results and a printable report feature may detract from the overall user experience. Support is available through various channels, including a blog and FAQs, though instant chat or phone support is missing.

Writefull’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts
Limits	n/a
Loyalty
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign-in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection	n/a
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

Writefull Paraphraser Review — 59/100 A*Help Score

Quick Overview for Writefull’s Paraphraser

Writefull offers AI-powered writing and proofreading services for students, claiming to leverage the latest in artificial intelligence technology. The website has an aesthetic and easy-to-use interface. However, the platform doesn’t offer as many paraphrasing options as one might think.

Writefull & Paraphrasing Help — 39/55

Writefull’s paraphrasing capabilities are notable for their consistency in maintaining word count and style, particularly excelling with technical texts where it managed to keep the original style and significantly reduce plagiarism and AI detection to zero. However, while personal and academic texts saw high readability, the academic texts struggled with high plagiarism detection rates. From our observation, we believe that this inconsistency suggests that while Writefull can effectively paraphrase to some extent, its output might require further refinement, especially in academic contexts to avoid plagiarism concerns.

Writefull Value for Money — 12/25

Writefull is positioned as a free tool, making it accessible without the need for time or mode subscriptions. We suppose this aspect could be appealing for users with minimal paraphrasing needs who seek a no-cost solution. However, the trade-off comes in the form of limited functionality and features, which might not justify even free usage for those in need of more comprehensive writing assistance. The absence of advanced features typically found in other paraphrasing tools makes it challenging to argue for great value, despite the lack of financial investment required.

Writefull Overall Experience — 8/20

The website experience of Writefull is generally positive, with an aesthetic and user-friendly interface devoid of distracting ads. The process of adding text for paraphrasing is straightforward, though the absence of file or link submission options, alongside no downloadable output formats, limits the tool’s usability. The lack of device accessibility options, such as mobile apps or browser extensions, further narrows its appeal to users se

Conclusion

Writefull is a basic paraphrasing tool suited for users with straightforward paraphrasing needs. It shines in maintaining word count and original style for various texts but falls short in advanced features, making it less ideal for users seeking comprehensive writing support. Its simplicity and ease of use are its strengths, yet its limitations in features, modes, and language support reflect its niche appeal.

AI-powered tools are bringing our writing experience to the next level. Consider exploring an AI essay checker free by AHelp to combine it with Writefull and guarantee the highest quality of your academic papers.

FAQ

Writefull’s Specs

> Styles/Modes
Simple
Advanced/Fluent
Creative
Academic
Other modes
> Features
Grammar check
Plagcheck
Proposing synonyms
> Languages
English
Spanish/Portuguese
German/French
Other
> Usage
Word limit	N/a
Trying before registration
> Pricing Plans
Time subscriptions
Mode subscriptions
> Website Experience
Aesthetic Interface
Easy to use
Number of ads	No ads
> Device accessibility
Apps
Browser extension
Plugins
> Text Submission
Add text
Add files/links
Download text/files
> Support
Support chat
Support email
> Registration&Privacy
Uses third-party registration methods (Apple, Facebook, Google, Microsoft account)
> Overall Paraphrasing Process
Highlighting changes
Changes by hand
> Text 1 (Personal)
Word count	Same
Style	Slight changes
Plagcheck	0%
AI detection	43.78%
Readability	High
> Text 2 (Academic)
Word count	Same
Style	Same
Plagcheck	65.57%
AI detection	42.42%
Readability	High
> Text 3 (Technical)
Word count	Same
Style	Same
Plagcheck	0%
AI detection	0%
Readability	Medium

The post Writefull AI Detector Review: based on real mystery shopping appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Quick Overview

Zero GPT is a free AI text detection software for students, educators, and other professionals that allows users to upload files or paste text to check for artificially created content. While the website is easy to navigate and provides immediate results, the service's accuracy has been found to be inconsistent, often mislabeling human-written text as AI-generated and struggling with certain types of generated text, raising questions about whether it can truly be considered the best AI text detector. Please remember that every tool has its use, and you may want to explore a new AI checker essay to review your academic paper as well.

[top-list-service-advatages] [top-list-service-advatages-list title="The Good" icon="good"] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Free plan[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Doesn’t require registration[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Supports multiple AI models[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [/top-list-service-advatages-list] [top-list-service-advatages-list title="The Bad" icon="bad"] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]No detailed text analysis[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [top-list-service-advatages-list-item]Inconsistent detection accuracy[/top-list-service-advatages-list-item] [/top-list-service-advatages-list] [/top-list-service-advatages]

[content_fragment id="117106" /]

With this whole AI advancement going around, it seems like it’s easy to get accused of using such tools even when you don't. The best way to avoid getting into a “Law & Order” kinda situation where you need to justify your essay writing before the board of professors, is to go for preventive methods. 

What you can do is use an AI detection tool to make sure you won’t be falsely accused. Such a service will help you find whether your writing has any trace of AI in it. And, if anything, adjust it to make it better. Many websites offer to do this work for you and ZeroGPT is amongst the most popular ones. Our A*Help team, therefore, took on the responsibility of testing this service and evaluating how well it could help in the AI detection battle. 

[wide_referral_block bg_color="#4c02e8" logo_url="https://academichelp.net/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/aidetector_shortcode2.png"] [link-button size="big" color="#46bb63" url="https://hub.ahelp.com/register"]Free AI Detector[/link-button] [/wide_referral_block]

ZeroGPT Mystery Shopping Experience

Most AI detectors are being bashed because of their high rate of false positives. This means that most platforms tend to mark even those texts that weren’t made with the help of AI as generated. For this reason, our A*Help team organized a special project to find the service that could provide the most accurate results. 

We took 3 different texts: 

1. One 100% human-written
2. Another – 100% AI-generated, 
3. The third one was human-written and then paraphrased with the help of AI. 

We then compared the results given by the AI detector to the factual indexes and included these results under the Detection Accuracy criteria.

Aside from that, we also took into account two more criteria: Value for money and Overall experience. When looking at the first one, we considered the variety of features offered, what kind of writing it could detect (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, Bard, human, etc.), whether it could analyze text files, code, or links, and how much it cost. When evaluating the overall experience, we noted how simple the website experience was, as well as the support and payment systems.

The three criteria put together form an A*Help score which reflects the quality of received service. ZeroGPT has now its rank so let’s see how it earned it.

ZeroGPT’s Detection Accuracy —15/50⭐️⭐️

The most interesting part of our mystery shopping was, of course, the testing of AI detection. To remind you, we had three texts: human-written, AI-generated, and a paraphrased version of the human-written essay. Let’s see how well ZeroGPT handled their evaluation.

Let’s start with the human-written piece. It was a personal essay written by our writer Johannes Helmold on the topic of gratitude. Even though Johannes wrote every word himself, ZeroGPT still marked the piece as AI-generated by 66.64%. Not something we would expect an AI detector to tell us, honestly.

The next text, which was in fact created by artificial intelligence, was, on the contrary, flagged as human-made. It was the same personal narrative essay but fully created with GPT-4. Still, the percentage of AI content detected in this instance was just 16.18%. That might be a great result for someone trying to overcome AI detection, but certainly not for those trying to get rid of generated content.

As to the writing that was a paraphrased version of the human-written essay, it was marked as AI-created by 82.36%. This result mainly shows that if you use the help of a paraphrasing tool to assist you in improving your paper, it’s unlikely that ZeroGPT will still recognize your own writing efforts.

In general, the results show that ZeroGPT is not the most trustful AI detection service out there. It does have a high false positive rate which may mislead both you and your professor during the assessment of your paper. 

AI Detection Results: 9/30

ZeroGPT’s Value for Money — 17/25⭐️⭐️⭐️

The choice of the AI Detector will, of course, mainly depend on its accuracy. However, it doesn’t mean that all other criteria don’t matter. After all, if you decide to stick to one platform, it’s better if it has an extensive toolkit at a reasonable price rate. 

ZeroGPT didn’t show the versatility we would expect, but it had its benefits to offer. The platform, for example, could detect the use of various AI chatbots and models. The list of detection possibilities started with GPT-3.5 all up to Bard and a mixture of both human and AI efforts. We also noted that the service claimed to have an error rate of just 2% So we were intrigued to see how our testing would go (disclaimer: didn’t get far). 

As to the available integration features, like a browser and Word extensions, there were hardly any. Yet, we found a couple of interesting things: an option for API integration, a Word Counter, and a bunch of extra tools ranging from a grammar checker and summariser to a citation generator.

Another important thing is in what form the service can accept your paper. ZeroGPT offered an option for copy-pasting plain text, however, it also provided an opportunity to upload both Word and PDF files, even in batches. This could make the work process much quicker and easier, especially if you had a few papers that needed to be checked. 

What was the most pleasant was that we used the service completely for free. The limit was only 15k characters per detection. There were paid offers, like a Pro plan for $9.99/month or $95.88/year or a Max subscription for $26.99/month or $227.88/year. These would give you more opportunities and bigger detection limits.

So, what can we say? ZeroGPT definitely has its perks, especially thanks to the free-to-use option and the varied range of AI services and models it can detect. However, the toolkit could be extended a little bit more for that top-ties value-for-money rate.

[top-list-service-score-box] [top-list-service-score-item value="5/5" caption="Tech detection" /] [top-list-service-score-item value="2/5" caption="Available tools" /] [top-list-service-score-item value="3/8" caption="Input sources" /] [top-list-service-score-item value="7/7" caption="Pricing" /][/top-list-service-score-box]

ZeroGPT’s Overall Experience — 18/25⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️

Your interaction with an online service is very important. Everything needs to be organized simply and smoothly, so you won’t waste your time waiting hours for your document to be uploaded to the website and the detection process to be complete.

Luckily, ZeroGPT was mostly pleasant to work with. The first thing that we liked was that we weren’t required to register or create a profile. This was a plus since creating an account on every platform you decide to use is just tiring. The service was also both pleasant to work with and look at thanks to a simple and handy interface. There were a few ads on the platform though which could be a bit distracting during the work process. The major thing that was missing was an opportunity to print out the final AI-detection report which would be useful in case you needed proof of your human-written work.

The customer service system, nonetheless, could have been much better. For online services, it’s important to be able to report bugs or discuss any other issues occurring on the website. Here, unfortunately, that couldn’t be done since the only support materials available were FAQs, a guide, and a blog. There was not an instant chat or even a report form in sight. So keep in mind that dealing with technical issues here would lie on you.

ZeroGPT didn’t offer the level of convenience we would expect from an online service, but it still was easily usable and quick. If you don’t mind the absence of a customer support system, then you will be able to work on the platform with almost no inconveniences, aside from a few ad banners popping up on the site.

[top-list-service-score-box] [top-list-service-score-item value="8/10" caption="Registration" /] [top-list-service-score-item value="8/8" caption="Website experience" /] [top-list-service-score-item value="2/7" caption="Support" /] [/top-list-service-score-box]

The Final Word

If you were thinking of using ZeroGPT to make sure your work wouldn’t be marked as “AI-written” during grading, maybe think twice. Sure, it’s a popular service that during our evaluation showed to have a great variety of features. The fact that it was also both free and simple to use made it an even more lucrative solution. Nonetheless, we didn’t see it provide us with the level of accuracy we wanted. Of course, the situation may be different in your case. Still, we would look around for some other solutions before sticking to this one. Especially if you don’t want to see those false accusations coming your way.

FAQ

[link-button size="big" align="center" url="https://hub.ahelp.com/register"]Try Free Alternative[/link-button]

The post ZeroGPT Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

ChatGPT Detector is a tool created to verify AI-written content, utilizing sophisticated algorithms to distinguish between human and AI-generated writing. While powerful in its functionality, the tool’s visual appeal is lacking, and it sometimes fails to identify AI-generated content correctly, raising questions about whether it is the best AI content detector available.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

ChatGPT Detector’s Accuracy —23.83/50

We discovered that ChatGPT Detector shows a commendable performance in accurately identifying entirely human-written texts, scoring a high 10/10 in this category. However, its capabilities are significantly limited when it comes to detecting AI-generated content or paraphrased texts, scoring only 1.3/10 and 3/10 respectively in these areas. This suggests that while the tool is reliable for confirming human authorship, it struggles with more complex detection tasks involving AI contributions. Its claim of “incredibly high accuracy” seems to be more applicable to human text detection than a holistic AI detection ability.

AI Detection Results: 14/30

ChatGPT Detector’s Value for Money —14/25

Considering its limited range of functionalities, ChatGPT Detector offers average value for money. It’s a free service, which is a significant advantage for users not willing to invest in AI detection tools. However, the absence of pricing plans, discounts, or loyalty programs might reflect its basic service nature. Users seeking advanced features or higher accuracy in AI detection might find the tool lacking.

ChatGPT Detector’s Overall Experience —9/25

The overall user experience with ChatGPT Detector is quite basic in our opinion. The website lacks an aesthetic interface but makes up for it with ease of use and a quick process. Multi-language detection is a plus, but the absence of a personal account option and limited support features like FAQs and a blog without instant support options may deter users looking for a more robust service. The tool’s simplicity could be appealing for those who prefer straightforward functionality without the need for registration or advanced features.

Various AI-powered tools should serve different needs: while using ChatGPT to detect AI-generated content, consider using a free AI essay checker to review and verify the quality of your academic papers.

FAQ

ChatGPT Detector’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts
Limits	n/a
Loyalty
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post ChatGPT Detector Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

GPTZero is a reliable provider with a good set of services, an appealing interface, and swift, seamless functionality. However, when it comes to content detection, the results of the tests are difficult to interpret clearly, and their accuracy may not fully meet expectations, raising questions about whether it ranks among the best AI content detectors. 

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

GPTZero’s Detection Accuracy —11.67/50

After our review of the service, GPTZero’s AI detection quality presents a mixed bag of results. While it successfully recognizes various AI models and human contributions, it falls short in accurately identifying texts that are entirely AI-generated or wholly human-written. For instance, in tests involving completely AI-generated content, GPTZero scored zero (pun not intended), indicating a significant gap in its detection capabilities. However, this AI writing detector performed moderately well in identifying paraphrased texts, suggesting some level of proficiency in dealing with mixed authorship. Overall, while GPTZero shows potential, its inconsistency in accurately pinpointing text origins is a notable drawback.

AI Detection Results: 7/30

AI detection results are extremely low in this case which is exactly the opposite of what a student might want. Instead, we advise you to pick out a Gptzero alternative with better AI detection capabilities.

GPTZero’s Value for Money —20/25

In the context of plagiarism detection and originality checking, comparing Gptzero vs Turnitin, we think GPTZero offers a compelling value-for-money proposition. It provides a free version with a 10,000 words per month limit and various paid plans tailored for students, educators, and professionals separately. For students, the pricing starts at $15/month for the Essential and plan and rises to $35/month for Professional. The paid subscriptions offer substantial character limits and access to enhanced detection models, making them attractive for heavy users. Additionally, the ‘Friends of GPTZero program offers a 30% commission on referrals, adding an incentive for user loyalty. However, the absence of discounts and limited payment options might be a drawback for some.

GPTZero’s Overall Experience —20/25

The user experience with GPTZero is adequate but leaves room for improvement. Registration is straightforward, with options for third-party sign-ins, enhancing accessibility. The website interface is aesthetically not simply pleasing and user-friendly, but also offer multi-lingual detection opportunities and printable reports. Support options include social media channels and a blog, but the absence of instant chat or phone support may be a downside for some users. We found that the tool’s integration with various platforms, like MS Word, adds to its practicality, especially for educational purposes.

FAQ

GPTZero’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts
Limits	Up to 10,000 words per month Premium AI detection models Batch file scanning 10 files Access to Origin Chrome Extension
Loyalty	Users can receive a 30% commission on all payments for paying customers you refer to gptzero.me
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post GPTZero Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Content at Scale is a company that offers a number of writing tools and an enhanced AI Detector. This detector is designed to differentiate between human-generated content generated by sophisticated AI models, such as ChatGPT, GPT-4, and Bard. The AI text detector can inspect up to 25,000 characters in a single analysis, providing a detailed examination and transparent ratings based on billions of individual data pages and words across multiple languages. The service is among the pioneers in AI content detection and is offered as one of the best AI detectors as a free tool. But does it live up to the claims?

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Content at Scale’s Detection Accuracy —16.67/50

We discovered that Content At Scale AI content detection is moderately effective, particularly in identifying paraphrased texts, with a score of 5/10. However, its performance is less impressive when it comes to distinguishing between purely AI-generated (1/10) and completely human-written texts (4/10). This suggests that while it can handle mixed authorship reasonably well, it struggles with extreme ends of the AI-human authorship spectrum. Its broad support for different AI technologies, including newer models like Claude and Gemini, is commendable, but this does not fully translate into high accuracy in detection.

AI Detection Results: 10/30

Content at Scale’s Value for Money —15/25

Content At Scale pricing policies are pretty standard and offer an average value for money. It provides a free version with a 2,500-character limit and a PRO version priced at $49/month, which includes an AI checker and generative AI. The loyalty program, offering a 15% recurring commission for referrals, is an attractive feature for promoting user engagement. However, in our opinion the absence of a free trial and limited payment options may deter some potential users. The tool seems reasonably priced for its offered features, though the accuracy issues might affect its overall appeal.

Content at Scale’s Overall Experience —16/25

The overall user experience based on Content At Scale reviews is fairly positive. The platform does not require registration or personal accounts, making it easily accessible. The website is user-friendly and quick to navigate, although it does not support multi-language detection or printable reports. Support is limited to leaving messages, a blog, and FAQs, with no options for instant chat or phone assistance. These factors combined make ContentAtScale a user-friendly tool, but one that might not meet the needs of users looking for in-depth support or advanced features.

FAQ

Content at Scale’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts	n/a
Limits	25000 characters at a time
Loyalty	Get 15% recurring commission on any of our products. This means $75 to $300 per month for each referral!
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection	n/a
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Content At Scale AI Review: based on real mystery shopping appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

The Writer AI content detector is an advanced, AI-driven tool created for authors, businesses, and digital marketers. It meticulously examines each part of the text, pinpointing areas such as redundancies and inconsistencies and suggesting possible enhancements. By doing so, it helps in optimizing content to reach the pinnacle of efficiency and interaction, making it a top 10 AI detector for content improvement.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

WriterAI’s Detection Accuracy — 33.33/50

The AI detection quality of Writer.com’s AI is reasonably good with an accuracy score of 33.33 out of 50. Our experiment proves that it successfully identifies text completely generated by AI and entirely human-written content. However, its performance dips when it comes to paraphrased text or content that blends human and AI writing. This indicates a need for further refinement in its algorithms to handle more complex text scenarios.

AI Detection Results: 20/30

Writer AI’s Value for Money —15/25

Writer.com’s AI detector offers a reasonable value for money with a score of 14 out of 25. It provides an AI detector free version that allows 5000 words at a time, suitable for big-scale checks. There are also pricing plans for teams and enterprises, with a 20% discount available for non-profits and educational institutions. We found that a limited selection of extra features like browser extensions or MS Word integration could be seen as limitations compared to other tools in the market.

Writer AI’s Overall Experience —12/25

The overall experience scores 12 out of 25. Registration is not required, which simplifies initial access. However, we noticed that the website’s user experience is minimalistic and not very intuitive, particularly for users who want to find the tool quickly and expect multi-language detection. The lack of a clear results display might hinder the experience on the website. Also, the absence of various customer support options like instant chat or phone support could be a drawback for users seeking immediate assistance.

FAQ

WriterAI’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools	AI Writer
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts	20% discount on the Team and Enterprise plans to non-profits and educational institutions
Limits	5k words in Free Plan Limit 500k words/month in TEAM
Loyalty
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options	Google sign-in
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection	n/a
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Writer.com AI Detector Review: based on real mystery shopping appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Passed AI leverages artificial intelligence’s capabilities to safeguard your content’s distinctiveness and genuineness. Ideally suited for teachers, scholars, and authors, it confirms the novelty of written materials, guaranteeing that each piece clears even the most challenging anti-plagiarism assessments with remarkable success – a result the best AI detector ought to have.

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

Free AI Detector

Passed AI’s Detection Accuracy —28.33/50

Passed AI shows commendable accuracy in identifying fully AI-generated text, hitting the mark with a 100% detection rate. This accuracy continues with paraphrased content, although at a lower effectiveness, indicating the tool’s robust algorithm against complex text manipulations. However, its performance dips significantly when tasked with discerning purely human-written text, misattributing a considerable portion to AI. This suggests that while Passed AI is highly capable in certain areas, it may require adjustments to better recognize genuine human authorship without overestimating AI contributions.

AI Detection Results: 17/30

Passed AI’s Value for Money —13/25

Passed AI’s pricing strategy offers reasonable value, especially with its unique features like the Document Audit, History Report, and Replay Tool accessible in the Standard plan for $9.99 per month. The inclusion of a 5-day free trial and the ability to earn promotional codes over time enhance its appeal. Furthermore, the loyalty program, which allows users to become affiliates and earn a 20% commission, presents an attractive opportunity for engaged users. Despite these benefits, the absence of a completely free tier and the somewhat limited toolset compared to competitors could influence potential users’ decisions.

Is it possible to guarantee impeccable accuracy when detecting AI? Well, you can do it for a raw generation, but most detectors genuinely struggle against heavy human editor’s impact and smart paraphrasing. Furthermore, another question arises: if a student spends a lot of time editing generated material, should we count the paper as human-written instead? Learn more by reading the Human plus AI Detectors article.

Passed AI’s Overall Experience —17/25

The overall user experience with Passed AI is positive, marked by an aesthetic and easy-to-navigate interface. Registration is straightforward, requiring a Google account, with no phone number necessary, which simplifies the process. The tool’s website is user-friendly, offering quick processes and multi-language detection, although it works best in English. However, the lack of an instant chat option and limited payment methods slightly detract from the service’s accessibility and convenience.

Conclusion

Passed AI stands as a solid choice for users seeking reliable AI content detection tools, especially within educational environments. Its strengths in accurately identifying AI-generated and paraphrased texts are notable, although improvements in detecting purely human-authored content would enhance its appeal. The overall value for money, combined with a user-friendly experience and a flexible pricing model, makes Passed AI a service worth considering for those in need of its specific capabilities.

We always recommend using AI detectors in combination with a free AI checker essay to guarantee the most accurate results possible.

FAQ

Passed AI’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard	n/a
Human
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts	Users can earn promo codes over time
Limits	200 free credits per month during trial500 credits – 100 000 words 1000 credits – 200 000 words 2000 credits – 400 000 words
Loyalty	become an affiliate – earn 20% commission
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options	(Google)
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
Clear results
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post Passed AI Review appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.

Winston AI detection tool is a solution for when you need to find proof that the text was written by a human or generated by an AI writer. Educators, content writers, students, you name it, everyone heard of it and uses it frequently. AcademicHelp worked with WinstonAI, checked 3 different essays, and we are ready to voice our verdict: a quick scanning process and accurate detection make it a valuable tool among AI writing detectors. 

TOP services	Our verdict	AHelp Score	🔥 Updated January 2024
AHelp AI Detector	Best AI content detector	72/100	Get free access
TurnItIn	Best product	66/100	Read review
CopyLeaks	Best value for money	65/100	Read review
Winston AI	Most flexible pricing system	63.67/100	Read review
Passed AI	Best overall experience	63.67/100	Read review

WinstonAI’s Detection Accuracy — 31.67/50

Winston AI detector showcases its technical prowess in AI detection through specific tests. This AI detector accurately identified a text fully written by AI as 99% AI-generated, aligning well with the text’s origin. Similarly, for a completely human-authored text, Winston detected 90% human involvement, indicating a high level of accuracy. However, the tool faced significant challenges in correctly identifying paraphrased text, suggesting a need for improvement in handling mixed or complex text compositions. Despite this, we find Winston’s overall accuracy as commendable.

AI Detection Results: 19/30

WinstonAI’s Value for Money — 18/25

We believe, Winston AI offers reasonable value for its price. The free version allows scans of up to 2,000 words and supports URL text scans and document uploads, including OCR technology for scanned documents. Paid plans range from $12 to $49 per month, with increasing word limits and features like advanced AI and plagiarism detection, and priority support. However, there are no browser extensions or MS Word integration, and no discounts are currently available. The tool provides a 40% commission for referrals in the first 12 months, which could be an attractive feature for some users.

WinstonAI’s Overall Experience — 19/25

The user experience with Winston AI checker is what we’d describe as generally positive. Registration is straightforward, with options for signing in via Google or Facebook, and does not require a phone number. The website interface is aesthetically pleasing, easy to navigate, and offers a quick process, with language options currently being English, French, Spanish, and German. Users can also generate printable reports, adding to the tool’s convenience.

FAQ

WinstonAI’s Specs

> TECH DETECTION
GPT-3.5
GPT-4
ChatGPT
Bard
Human
Human + AI	n/a
Trusted in education	n/a
> TOOLS
API integration
Browser extension (Chrome)
MS Word
Addit. on-board tools
> DETECTION OPTIONS
files (pdf, word)
simple text (copy-paste)
URL
Code files
Batch files upload	n/a
> PRICING PLANS & LIMITS
Free
Free trial
Discounts
Limits	n/a
Loyalty	40% commission on all payments within the first 12 months for paying customers you refer to the service
> REGISTRATION
Required
Third-party sign in options
Needs phone number
Personal account
> WEBSITE EXPERIENCE
Aesthetic Interface
Easy-to-use
Quick process
Multi-language detection
Printable report
> SUPPORT
Leave a message
Instant chat
Phone
Social media channels
Blog
FAQ and guides

The post WinstonAI Review: based on real mystery shopping appeared first on AcademicHelp.net.